Hallo
I work with a 18F4620 at 39321600Hz.In the moment i have 8ms for
1 pass.My question : which time-window is respectable? (z.b. sps)?
I know the shortest time is the best..... but was is in the praxis acceptable?
Regards wolfgang
run time
-
saschech@gmx.de
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:41 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 26 times
- Contact:
Hi Wolfgang,
All depends on the kind of application your writing. If you wrote a small calculator 8ms would be an acceptable cycle time. For a PLC 8ms is quitte fast.
I've written applications that keep it under 100us at 12Mhz clock, i've written applications that take up to 500ms worst case cycle.
Like I said, it depends the application. If you would like to receive RC5 Remote control, just receiving the IR remote control would take more than 10ms, nevermind acting accordingly.
KK.
All depends on the kind of application your writing. If you wrote a small calculator 8ms would be an acceptable cycle time. For a PLC 8ms is quitte fast.
I've written applications that keep it under 100us at 12Mhz clock, i've written applications that take up to 500ms worst case cycle.
Like I said, it depends the application. If you would like to receive RC5 Remote control, just receiving the IR remote control would take more than 10ms, nevermind acting accordingly.
KK.
The chief wonder of education is that it does not ruin everybody concerned in it. (Henry Brooks Adams)
-
saschech@gmx.de
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:41 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 26 times
- Contact:
run time
Hallo
The same program Flowcode > pic @ 40mhz
> AVR @ 20mhz
know somebody the run_time difference?
I think it is important for tim_critical projekts like a sps.
wolfgang
The same program Flowcode > pic @ 40mhz
> AVR @ 20mhz
know somebody the run_time difference?
I think it is important for tim_critical projekts like a sps.
wolfgang