Matrix user forums

Hello Benj """"The C code should use bit 4 instead of bit 5. Bit 5 is the interrupt edge for INT1""""" You are right , after i change my c-code from "" intcon2 = intcon2 ^ 0x20;"" to ""intcon2 = intcon2 ^ 0x10;"" now code work on hardware >> my mistake was , I count the bits incorrect........ Thanks...

Hello Benj

I go these way also without success.
With your new code
the encoder work also only at all second stepp(I think the "int-flanke" not change) same as without these code.

anyway thank`s for help

Regards Wolfgang

Hello
Nobody can help?

Regards Wolfgang

Hello If I call a secont time the int-macro to change the edge level, I become a warning,code not working.... A c-macro with: intcon2 = intcon2 ^ 0x20; no correct work on my hardware What is the correct way to change the level fron rising to falling to rising ...... edge inside my code? xxxxxxxxxxxx...

Hello brandonb

The MPLAB say`s if i want use these chip........no support

Pickcit3 , I self work with these from China(less in the price)
http://www.ebay.de/sch/i.html?_from=R40 ... Categories

Regards Wolfgang

Hello Jonny

Thank`s for answer,i understand

Have a nice time wolfgang

Hello Jonny V4 work a different way as V5: V5 : If the red bevel mark "end icon" (inside the call macro) >> one more "step into" >> red bevel mark "Call Macro" in the main,without change the variable >> one more "step into" the value have the correct value oh oh............ V4 : If the red bevel mar...

Hello Jonny

Do you have any idea what going wrong the value of the return variable all times 0 ?

Point 2. with these i can live.......

Regards Wolfgang

Hello Jonny

Unfortunately I must tell you,after test again , with lokal : return, Parameters,constants and variable;
(point 2. loost after..) refer for all four lokal types.

Have a nice evening wolfgang

Hello

1.If I have in a user macro a "return variable an " , all time show " an" 0x00.....dont work
2.After close and reopen v5,locale variablen (.return) in the debug-window are loost...
Both points are working in V4 ok
Regards Wolfgang

Hello Steve

After run your patch,the language change from germ. to english;but if I change back to german,close and reopen I have the thame "error"

Regards Wolfgang

Hello Jonny

Excuse,I mean, look the screenshot.......

The patch was without success.I think it give the error after the first change of the language (with all language).

Regards wolfgang

Hello Jonny

""Keep an eye on the web links in Flowcode (Menu->Help->Online Resources...) for the latest updates and patches.""

I receiving: look >> *.gif

After i click "email update link" i become no mail
(I test with your update and after uninstall with the downloadet full )

Regards wolfgang

Hello dazz

Use the PPP , please you can tell me the way ,program the chip without erease the EEprom?
Inside config MPLAB it is one mark and work propper........

Regards Wolfgang

Hello John In V4 compile a big code time was minutes >> compile with "sourceboost full" inside MPLAB ,time was seconds..... The compiling time is a important point to go these way for me. I can not test the time-difference of the two ways,because i have errors if i compile inside MPLAB.Include the f...

Hello

I have also no success burn with ICD3-MPLAB.With V4 no probs.
I can burn, but the cod dont work on hardware>>>>burn inside v5 with PicKit3 The thame code, all ok.

Regards Wolfgang

Hi Jonny

shift = 16
value = value << shift I test without success;show the same.

suggest for a new way,I do "dummi_long << 8" for two times and load with the result ; works fine on my hardware!
Thanks for your help!!!!!!
I test it two way`s it work also.....Hurra

Regards Wolfgang

He Jonny

Thanks for answer.You have any idea why "long variable xyz << 16" not work on my hardware?

Regards Wolfgang

Hi Jonny A long time I experiment a "long variable" e.g. ..settime[1] 99999 = 3 byte 159,134,1 in the F_RAM to save and build back. I read back to the three byte-variable and want build the value 99999 back without success. In simulation it work ok but on my hardware the value is (without the 1 = 65...

Hello
In simulation the (0x869f) is incorect >> (0x1869F)

Regards Wolfgang

Hello

I have variable : flag >> ...._flag >> ....._......_flag

If I search for variable flag , all variable with flag are listet.

I think , if I search *flag* then all listet but search for flag only the flag is listet ?????

Regards Wolfgang

Hi Jonny

Ok these i now,in my case it is a little bit uncomfortable,but i can live good with these;thankyou

Regards Wolfgang

Hi Benj

One question more:

My bubble go up to "int_ist_flag[32];what is the most simple way to go back to "one line bubble" ?

mark show and unmark it is no change on the bubble-size.

Regards and thank´s wolfgang

Hi Jonny

Stop it was my mistake,I test it on a one line bubble!!!!!

but
What mean exactly:

""and reducing the size of the annotation down to its smallest size will cause it to be >>>>>>>>>>hidden for that icon <<<<<<<<<<<<<<""

Regards Wolfgang

Hi Jonny

On my pc,hold down the left schift key and dubble click annotation bubble >> no effect i can show ???


Regards Wolfgang